与毛万宝先生商榷＂兰亭论辩＇３
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">三，“兰亭论辩是毛泽东授意吗？</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 22.5pt; mso-char-indent-count: 1.5; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">在拙作中，我提出“可以肯定的是兰亭论辩是毛泽东授意，康生组织，郭沫若参与的一场所谓唯物主义与唯心主义的阶级之争。”当时我就考虑此观点是否过于犀利，引起争论，但当时限于篇幅，无法再深入下去，就补充了一句：“毛泽东对于高二适文中引用一些历朝历代帝王，重臣对兰亭序真伪的认定心存不满，认为其世界观不正确，阶级立场不对”。既然<personname wst="on" productid="毛万宝">毛万宝</personname>先生提出反对意见，认为：“毛泽东是应章士钊的请求赞成高二适文章公开发表的，这中虽有照顾章士钊情面的因素，但更主要的还在于想以此倡导一下学术上的百家争鸣根本谈不上什么授意。”那笔者就此<personname wst="on" productid="谈谈与毛">谈谈与毛</personname>先生不同观点。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">毛先生此观点与北京冯其庸及云南高二适弟子张诚观点基本一致，都认为毛泽东支持高二适畅所欲言，体现当时百花齐放，百家争鸣的宽松学术氛围。许多专家把兰亭论辩中政治风波归结为康生，认为是其幕后指挥，暗中操纵的结果，这在郑重《回眸兰亭论辨》（载于《文汇报》</span><chsdate wst="on" year="1998" month="11" day="26" islunardate="False" isrocdate="False"><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">1998</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">年</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">11</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">月</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">26</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">日</span></chsdate><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">），及纪红《兰亭论辩是怎样的笔墨官司》（载于《书屋》</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">2001</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">年</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">1</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">期）关于黄苗子信函有详述，可参考。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 22.5pt; mso-char-indent-count: 1.5; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">但如果读者细细思考，肯定会有困惑，因为在兰亭论辩中，毛泽东</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">7</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">月</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">18</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">日给郭沫若信中已经定性为笔墨官司，那就要公平，公正，公开让双方平等讲道理，摆事实，谁胜负由读者评定，决定。康生乃是一介不折不扣的政客，作为政客首先应是“唯上”，然后才是“唯实”。既然毛泽东已经定性为“笔墨官司”，指示康生执行，在当时特定政治环境下康生是没有胆量去做违背毛泽东旨意的事。退一步，假设康生作为“兰亭论辩”的当事者，加之与郭沫若私交甚深，他欺上瞒下，帮助郭沫若与高二适打这场“笔墨官司”，做了一些小动作，可能会瞒住毛泽东，但一定瞒不过高二适的老师章士钊。在章含之主编《跨过厚厚的红门》书中可知道章士钊眼睛是容不得沙子，加之其与毛泽东言路一直畅通无阻，为何章在康生插手兴风作浪时却沉默不语，这不是章的风格。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 22.5pt; mso-char-indent-count: 1.5; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">其实在“兰亭论辩”事件中，最早提出“阶级斗争”“唯物史观问题”就是毛泽东写给章士钊</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">1965</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">年</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">7</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">月</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">18</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">日信中及</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">8</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">月</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">2</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">日致信康生：“、、、、、、唯作者（指章士钊）不懂唯物史观，于文史哲诸方面止于作者观点，他日可能引起历史学家用唯物史观对此进行批判”。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 30pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">看此两信，好象与高二适“兰亭论辩”不搭界，是批评章士钊《柳文指要》，但推敲以一下，高文经章推荐，高又是章的学生，章给毛泽东信中特别强调：“钊两度细核，觉论据都有来历”。说明两人思想一致，，且都有在国民政府任职这一特定背景。再联想章士钊</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">9</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">月</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">17</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">日对《光明日报》记者讲：“传说章某在这讨论中，自己不出马，指使高二适试探一下，在幕后摇旗呐喊，使我感到此事一下子又卷进了政治漩涡。这个问题现在不曾单是学术问题了”。以上应该能理解毛泽东针对《柳文指要》的指示被用在</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"></font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">“兰亭论辩”中的合理性。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p>
页:
[1]
