与毛万宝先生商榷＂兰亭论辩＇４
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 30pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">但这只是旁证，一种合理推测。在康生给郭沫若信中（</span><chsdate wst="on" year="1965" month="8" day="17" islunardate="False" isrocdate="False"><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">1965/8/17</font></span></chsdate><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">）：“今天在接见部队干部时，主席问我：‘郭老《兰亭序》官司怎么样了，能不能打嬴了？’看来主席对此问题颇有兴趣。我回答：‘可以打赢’当然这些头脑顽固的人要改变他们宗教迷信是难的。”</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 30pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">从信中读出三个讯息：一、毛泽东关心郭沫若笔墨官司输赢，主观有些倾向性，二、康生在毛泽东面前打包票郭沫若能赢，三康生提出“这些头脑顽固的人”应该已经不单指章士钊，肯定将高二适包括进去了。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 30pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">郭沫若接到康生信后，当天将，《〈驳议〉的商讨》和，〈〈〈兰亭序〉与老庄思想〉〉文章清样送给毛泽东。</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"></font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">八月二十号毛泽东写信给郭沫若信：“八月十七日信及大作现两篇请样，均已收读，文章极好。特别是找出赵之谦骂皇帝一段有力。看来过分崇拜帝王将相者在现代还不乏其人，有批评，即成为非圣无法是要准备对付的。第一页上有一点文字上的意见，是否如此，请酌见”。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">
<p></p></font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1;"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">由于郭沫若在八月十二日</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">
</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">《〈驳议〉的商讨中》，把学术问题引伸到封建帝王的批判，迎合了毛泽东的口味，符合了那个特定时代的政治气息毛泽东终于在这封信中明确站在郭沫若一边，连郭沫若文中人名错误都指出，说明对此文的重视，及希望打赢这场官司的心情，既然毛泽东已批示可以“对付”而且康生还在毛泽东面前打包票能打赢这场笔墨官司，就有了康生不遗佘力组织专家写了近十篇文章，集中《文物》和《光明日报》狂轰乱炸的情景。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; mso-line-height-alt: 1.0pt; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">也就能理解</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">1973</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">年《兰亭论辨》出版说明了：“报上刊发表了不少文章，多少文章赞成郭沫若同志的意见，支持他以辩证唯物主义批评态度推翻历代帝王重臣的评定；但也有文章持相反的看法</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">……</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">应当指出，这种争论反映了唯物史观与唯心史观的斗争。”</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 30pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0; mso-line-height-alt: 1.0pt; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">这也就是笔者为何认定此笔墨官司是毛泽东‘授意’，康生‘组织’，郭沫若‘参于’的原因。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 30pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0; mso-line-height-alt: 1.0pt; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">为了写这篇拙文，笔者又深刻学<personname wst="on" productid="习了毛">习了毛</personname>先生近一年来发表得三篇关于“兰亭论辩”的大文。尽<personname wst="on" productid="管对毛">管对毛</personname>先生关<personname wst="on" productid="于启功">于启功</personname>先生在“兰亭论辩”的态度，及“兰亭论辩”中关于“圈内”，“圈外”的评述存在一些疑问，但限于篇幅，无法<personname wst="on" productid="向毛">向毛</personname>先生讨教，同时想善意提醒<personname wst="on" productid="毛">毛</personname>先生您在《纪念兰亭论辩</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">40</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">周年、中国〈泰州〉高二适书法艺术高层论坛文汇编》</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">29</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">页，关于“沈尹默，邓散木，白蕉，潘伯鹰等人，但他们对兰亭真伪问题只能私下里口头议论</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">……</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">而没有一人能站出来写篇系统的议论文章。”此句中邓散木</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><font face="Times New Roman">1963</font></span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">年已病逝，怎能参与兰亭真伪的文章争论。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; TEXT-INDENT: 30pt; mso-char-indent-count: 2.0; mso-line-height-alt: 1.0pt; tab-stops: 33.75pt;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt; FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">行文即将结束，再次方谢谢<personname wst="on" productid="毛万宝">毛万宝</personname>先生对我的忠告；“若一味依靠‘二手货’或‘大致印象’那就必要吃亏上当以讹传讹别人得错误未能纠正反而把自己的错误于众了”。期待能早日拜读《兰亭论辩：学术背后的政治阴影》。</span><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 15pt;"><p></p></span></p>
页:
[1]
